Academic Honesty Policy
Introduction:
In accordance with the Standards for Registered Training Organisations (RTOs) 2025, this Academic Honesty Policy demonstrates FAP First Aid’s commitment to ethical and professional conduct in vocational education and training (VET). In particular, it reflects the key principles of Clause 1.8, which emphasise the importance of the Principles of Assessment (fairness, flexibility, validity, reliability) and Rules of Evidence (validity, sufficiency, authenticity, currency) in all assessment practices.
Academic honesty is integral to ensuring the credibility of learning outcomes, the integrity of assessment processes, and the value of qualifications issued. This policy establishes a clear framework for promoting and maintaining honesty, authenticity, and accountability in all learner work and assessment submissions. It acknowledges that academic integrity underpins the development of competent, trustworthy professionals and safeguards the reputation of both the learner and the RTO.
Scope and Application:
Overview:
Policy:
Plagiarism:
Plagiarism, defined as the act of appropriating others’ ideas, writings, or work and presenting them as one’s own without acknowledging the original author, is considered a fraudulent act that infringes upon another’s intellectual property. FAP First Aid emphasises that learners must clearly attribute ideas borrowed from external sources and that mere superficial alterations do not conceal the use of another’s words. Failure to acknowledge the source of a direct quote or specific writing without proper reference or acknowledgment is regarded as plagiarism.
Examples of plagiarism encompass:
- Directly copying one or more paragraphs, sentences, or significant portions of text.
- “Copy and paste” of content from a single or multiple sources.
- Submitting collaborative work as one’s individual effort.
- Copying or adapting another learner’s original work in a submitted assessment.
- Using software or websites designed for plagiarism, such as an ‘article spinner,’ or AI tools like ChatGPT.
- Notwithstanding the above, if more than 15% of a learner’s work is found to be plagiarised, the learner may be required to resubmit the assessment.
Resubmission of Plagiarised Work:
Cheating and Collusion
- Collaborating on assignments when it is not a requirement of the assessment.
- Copying all or part of assignments from another participant.
- Submitting the work of others or a modified version of work from previous courses.
- Engaging in dishonest conduct in studies and assessment tasks.
FAP First Aid's Expectations
- Generate their own ideas.
- Draw upon information from the unit’s learning support materials and other relevant sources, expressing it in their own words.
- When a question necessitates quoting from legislation, regulation, or codes of practice, learners may reproduce the relevant text, provided they properly reference it, e.g., “The Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (the WHS Act) provides a framework to protect the health, safety, and welfare of all workers at work. It also safeguards the health and safety of all other individuals who might be affected by the work” (WHS Act Qld, 2020).
- For questions requiring an explanation related to legislation, regulation, or codes of practice, learners must formulate their responses in their own words.
- Complete their own work, refraining from collusion, copying, or utilising others’ work.
- Strictly avoid the use of artificial intelligence (AI). All submitted work must be the product of the learner’s own efforts.